Crash Landing

Crash Landing
Type: ---
Power- 100
PP: 10
Accuracy: 80
Physical
Has a 50% chance of being Physical or special, & a 50% chance of being water or flying.

What do you think?

I think it should be always a physical flying move! but if you need luck to score a super effective hit on a completely anwary rock, fire or something else pokemon it's a good idea. I think that it needs some explanation on how is that calculated!

I think 50% Bug, 50% Flying would make more sense than Water.


Although I kind of like the split type, I'm not so sure about Physical/Special.

Its part Flying because your falling From the sky. Part water because you can land in water. But I will make it physical.

I think it should be 50% flying or 50% steel cz now we have the plane pokemon...

You do realize that By keeping it 50% water the planes get better(Granted unreliable)coverage Right? & I think it makes more sense to keep it Fly Water for reasons mentioned previosly.

Fine... As you wish!

I think that is kinda strange get an 2-types attack.

I also think its strange that Delibird's present can restore the opponents hp. So? Pokemon has never made sense. Macargo is hotter than the Sun.

And Volcarona's fire is used as the sun. But, I still think that is weird.

I think this should have also some recoil damage... Raise the accuracy to 90%.

This doesn't make sense, logic wise and mechanic wise. Why does something related to smashing into the foe have a chance of being to different types? Why can it be physical or special when the act of crashing into something is clearly physical? Why would anyone use an incredibly unreliable move that would have about a 25% chance of being what they want? And that doesn't include the accuracy...

Seriously, this would be much better as a high-base-power Steel-type attack that gives recoil. To me, it seems like you shoehorned in all those unnecessary elements.

I agree. If we make it steel-type, it seems really similar to Heavy Slam in terms of concept, and I think we could just teach the plane pokemon Heavy Slam instead.

I think crash landing would be best as a steel type physical attack.
Base power 120 accuracy 100% and gives recoil... Like a steel type double edge!

GuardChomp- wrote:Crash Landing
Type: ---
Power- 100
PP: 10
Accuracy: 80
Physical
Has a 50% chance of being Physical or special, & a 50% chance of being water or flying.

What do you think?

The idea sounds good but in my opinion you should stay with 50% being phys/spec or 50% being wat/fly rather than both of them, it seems too complicated! Something else, Guardchomp; your drawings and sprites have completely dissapeared, i don't know how you uploaded them but they have just gone away. Could you reupload them? It's quite a hard work, i know but right now is like they hadn't existed...

umm just a bit of input to kind of end this debate. just saying i spent 2 hours looking for a way to factor in the 50/50 type split (i'm just going to assume its going to be physical) and on rpg maker it is not possible to have randomized what type it is. i agree with the 120 base steel (since ships and planes are both made out of metal) and recoil damage